31,114,698 unique visits
Navigation
General chapters
Introduction
The 2002 Checklist (introduction)
History of Dutch lists
Applications of the list
Contributors
Bibliography
Contribute
Message to Webmaster
Submit Reference
Select family
Users Online
Guests Online: 1

Members Online: 0

Total Members: 5
Newest Member: Kees Boele
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
No Threads created
Hottest Threads
No Threads created
FAMILY PSILIDAE
Paul L.Th. Beuk and Volkert S. van der Goot Version date: 25-11-2020 18:01

Diagnosis. Small to medium-sized flies (3.0-7.0 mm); body yellowish or reddish to black. Head with relatively small eyes, most often with receding mouth edge; antennae small or with strongly elongated third segment and arista (Loxocera ). Thorax slightly arched; dorsocentral setae usually present. Wings hyaline or infuscated; costa with subcostal break; anal vein not reaching wing margin; surface with a transverse weakening in basal half. Legs without strong setae except for apical tibial setae. Abdomen short to long; sometimes strongly tapering in females.

Biology. All species have phytophagous larvae. Loxocera has been reared from Juncus stems; some species of Chamaepsila are recorded as pest species on umbellifers and some other plants. Chyliza leptogaster has been recorded as inquiline in galls; C. extenuata lives in Orobanche. Adults generally are found in herbaceous vegetation or on leafs shrubs and trees.

General references. Bygebjerg et al. (2011 [Chyliza]), Van der Goot & Van Veen (1987, 1996 [keys]), Iwasa (1998 [general]), Shatalkin & Merz (2010 [Chamaepsila pallida group, Psila]), Steyskal (1987c [general]), Wang (1988 [Chamaepsila]).

References to the local fauna. Van der Goot (1989b, 1991b), Van der Goot & Van Veen (1987, 1996), Theowald (1954c), Van der Wulp & De Meijere (1898).

How to quote this page: Beuk, P.L.Th., & V.S. van der Goot, 2020. Family Psilidae. In: Beuk, P.L.Th. (Ed.): Checklist of the Diptera of the Netherlands, https://diptera-info.nl/news.php?fam=Psilidae (date accessed: 09/06/2026).

NL: 22, 2? B: 16 D: 22, 2? UK: 26 World: 170
 
PSILIDAE
                 
  Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917
  subg. Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917
  atra (Meigen, 1826)
  buccata (Fallén, 1826)
  = gracilis (Meigen, 1826) Note 1
  limbatella (Zetterstedt, 1847)
  nigra (Fallén, 1820)
  nigricornis (Meigen, 1826)
  pallida (Fallén, 1820)
  = bicolor (Meigen, 1826): misident. sensu Van der Wulp & De Meijere, 1898
  pectoralis (Meigen, 1826)
  persimilis (Wakerley, 1959) N; added by Van der Goot & Van Veen (1987: 38
  rosae (Fabricius, 1794)
  subg. Tetrapsila Frey, 1925
  obscuritarsis (Loew, 1856) N; added by Van der Goot (1991b: 143
                 
  Chyliza Fallén, 1820
  subg. Chyliza Fallén, 1820
  annulipes Macquart, 1835
  leptogaster (Panzer, 1798)
  nova Collin, 1944
  vittata Meigen, 1826
  subg. Dasyna Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830
  extenuata (Rossi, 1790)
                 
  Imantimyia Frey, 1925 Note 2
  albiseta (Schrank, 1803)
  fulviventris (Meigen, 1826)
  sylvatica (Meigen, 1826)
                 
  Loxocera Meigen, 1803
  subg. Loxocera Meigen, 1803
  aristata (Panzer, 1801)
  subg. Platystyla Macquart, 1835 Note 3
  hoffmannseggi Meigen, 1826
                 
  Psila Meigen, 1803
  fimetaria (Linnaeus, 1761)
  merdaria Collin, 1944
 
Doubtful species
 
  Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917    
  subg. Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917  
  rufa (Meigen, 1826)   Note 4
  villosula (Meigen, 1826)   Note 5
 
Deleted species
 
  Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917  
  subg. Chamaepsila Hendel, 1917  
  bicolor (Meigen, 1826)   Note 6
 
Notes
Note 1 Synonymy by Soós (1985: 243).
Note 2 The use of Imantimyia as valid genus for these species follows Shatalkin & Merz (2010) since this usage was followed by subsequent authors. However, in practice they would have been justified to treat it as a subgenus of Loxocera.
Note 3 Platystyla was synonymised with Loxocera by Buck & Marshall (2006) but reinstated as valid subgenus of Loxocera by Shatalkin & Merz (2010).
Note 4 Doubtfully indigenous according to Van der Goot & Van Veen (1987: 36).
Note 5 The identity of the only recorded specimen by Van der Goot & Van Veen (1987: 40; 1996: 36) was questioned by Van der Goot (1991b: 143). He could not rule out that it represented an aberrant specimen of C. rosae.
Note 6 Deleted by Theowald (1954c: 176) as misidentification of C. pallida.
 
The latest revisions at different levels
The family introduction was last edited on 12-08-2014 18:35
Imantimyia was the last (sub)genus to be edited on 05-02-2014 15:45
Chamaepsila buccata was the last (sub)species to be edited on 25-11-2020 18:01















Copyright Paul Beuk 2002-2020
White_n_Light Theme by: Smokeman
Powered by PHP-Fusion copyright © 2002 - 2026 by Nick Jones.
Released as free software without warranties under GNU Affero GPL v3.
Render time: 0.57 seconds